Stand Your Ground

Illegal Firearm

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Legal Questions and Answers

Legal Questions and Answers

By speedingticketkc


Question about defending yourself with illegal firearm.?

Hi, I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on this. If someone attacks me or breaks into my home, and I have an illegal firearm I use to defend my life, will I get charged with murder or any felony gun charges?

Your Answer:

The question you have presented covers multiple areas of criminal law. I am going to base my answer on the common law, model penal code, and Missouri Law I am going to start with the easiest part first.

  1. May you use an illegal firearm in your home and have a reasonable fear for your life. Yes. One may always defend themselves with a weapon they have as long as it is reasonable force.
  2. Would you be committing felony murder. No. Felony murder at the common law is the killing of a person while in the commission of a felony. Owning an illegal firearm is a felony but not a felony in the common law and not considered a felony that presents a foreseeable danger.( I am assuming the weapon is an unregistered rifle or hand gun and not a nuclear weapon or canon). So the killing of another while in the process of mailing forged documents would not be felony murder.
  3. Felony Gun Charges. Yes, you own an illegal firearm, which does not require intent to convict, mere possession is enough.
  4. The Castle doctrine aka “stand your ground.” Below is the Missouri statute which explains all parts of self protection in your home.

Use of force in defense of persons. 563.031. 1. A person may, subject to the provisions of subsection 2 of this section, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such force to be necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful force by such other person, unless:

(1) The actor was the initial aggressor; except that in such case his or her use of force is nevertheless justifiable provided:

(a) He or she has withdrawn from the encounter and effectively communicated such withdrawal to such other person but the latter persists in continuing the incident by the use or threatened use of unlawful force; or

(b) He or she is a law enforcement officer and as such is an aggressor pursuant to section 563.046; or

(c) The aggressor is justified under some other provision of this chapter or other provision of law;

(2) Under the circumstances as the actor reasonably believes them to be, the person whom he or she seeks to protect would not be justified in using such protective force;

(3) The actor was attempting to commit, committing, or escaping after the commission of a forcible felony.

  1. A person may not use deadly force upon another person under the circumstances specified in subsection 1 of this section unless:

(1) He or she reasonably believes that such deadly force is necessary to protect himself, or herself or her unborn child, or another against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony;

(2) Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle lawfully occupied by such person; or

(3) Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property that is owned or leased by an individual claiming a justification of using protective force under this section.

  1. A person does not have a duty to retreat from a dwelling, residence, or vehicle where the person is not unlawfully entering or unlawfully remaining. A person does not have a duty to retreat from private property that is owned or leased by such individual.
  2. The justification afforded by this section extends to the use of physical restraint as protective force provided that the actor takes all reasonable measures to terminate the restraint as soon as it is reasonable to do so.
  3. The defendant shall have the burden of injecting the issue of justification under this section. If a defendant asserts that his or her use of force is described under subdivision (2) of subsection 2 of this section, the burden shall then be on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not reasonably believe that the use of such force was necessary to defend against what he or she reasonably believed was the use or imminent use of unlawful force.


This web site, and any and all information on this web site, is for general informational purposes only and to provide general information regarding our law firm and its services. This site is not intended to be a substitute for specific legal advice about your or any other legal case or matter. Your accessing or viewing this web site does not create an attorney-client relationship. An attorney-client relationship is created only upon our acceptance of your case and your full payment and our acceptance of attorney’s fees, a “hold” on a credit card that has not been “captured” does not constitute our acceptance of your case

All information provided by this site, including summaries and articles on legal topics, is general in nature and provided for informational purposes only. This information is not intended as legal advice, and should not be taken as such. Legal advice involves an attorney’s application of legal knowledge and judgment to specific facts and circumstances presented by a client. Before providing specific advice, a lawyer may need to conduct legal research and/or obtain additional facts. Nonlawyers should therefore not draw conclusions about what may be legally required, permissible, or advisable based solely upon consultation of general sources of legal information, including this and other law firm websites, without first seeking appropriate legal advice.

Be the first to write a comment.

Your feedback